Ich bin zurück!“ Mit diesen drei Worten kündigte Box-Legende Mike Tyson (53) sein Comeback an. In einem Trainings-Video, das durch soziale. 'Iron Mike': Klitschko gehört zu den ganz Großen. Mike Tyson hat nach dem Rücktritt von Wladimir Klitschko dessen Karriere gewürdigt: "Auf. mike tyson comeback.
Boxen: Mike Tyson adelt Wladimir und Vitali KlitschkoBox-Großmaul Shannon Briggs will den Comeback-Kampf von Mike Tyson skurril im Stil von WWE inszenieren. Auch Wladimir Klitschko soll. 'Iron Mike': Klitschko gehört zu den ganz Großen. Mike Tyson hat nach dem Rücktritt von Wladimir Klitschko dessen Karriere gewürdigt: "Auf. mike tyson comeback.
Mike Tyson Vs Klitschko Random Quote VideoTyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko FULL FIGHT
Lotte Rostock. - Schwarzenegger, Moeller und Klitschko sollen helfenIch habe das bekannteste Gesicht im Sport…. Für Box-Legende Mike Tyson zählt der jüngst zurückgetretene Wladimir Klitschko zu den besten Boxern aller Zeiten. Dennoch glaubt er, dass. Box-Großmaul Shannon Briggs will den Comeback-Kampf von Mike Tyson skurril im Stil von WWE inszenieren. Auch Wladimir Klitschko soll. Mike Tyson wird wie folgt zitiert: „Wer ist dieser Klitschko überhaupt? Ich habe keine Ahnung. Man muss den Namen googeln, wenn man etwas. Ich bin zurück!“ Mit diesen drei Worten kündigte Box-Legende Mike Tyson (53) sein Comeback an. In einem Trainings-Video, das durch soziale.
Former unified champ Klitschko, 43, became a dominant force in the heavyweight division from the mids until his stunning defeat against Tyson Fury in During an 'Ask Me Anything' on Reddit , a fan asked Tyson for his verdict on Klitschko's long reign over heavyweight boxing.
The fan pointed to criticisms about the Ukrainian dominating for so long due to the lack of world-class boxers.
But the fan also asked Tyson if he thought Klitschko would have been a "formidable heavyweight champion even in the 'Golden Age? I promise you'll get a knockout by waiting until the later rounds like Klitschko does, when opponents are worn down and start being aggressive.
Should I blame him for being smart? The way some of these guys look today, I would give James Buster Douglas the edge to be the king of this weight class!
Even thought Bowe dodged Lewis, had they fought, Lewis would not have "walked over" Bowe, as would be the case Wlad vs Bowe.
To simply dismiss great modern boxing champ against Wlad with a simple statement "he would throw his belt in the trash" but devote 10 articles to how Wladimir would kill a champ of 40 years ago does not cut it.
Once again you are miscomparing stats to prove your point. Tyson had a solid punch that knocked out well over 20 opponents all taller than him.
After he went to prison where he couldn't train he was on a decline, especially when don king that ex murderer started to influence him and distract him.
Tyson would have destroyed klitcho because klitcho faces the same problem, never having fought a fighter of decent skill except Lewis and he got it handed to him.
Tyson and Tommy Morrison are my 2 favourite boxers and they both were champions and both competitive in the modern sense.
But they would NOT have destroyed the Klitschko's dude. Tommy was not skilled enough to get inside Wlad and land his big bombs.
He still had enough skill to last with Wlad and had a strong punchers chance one of the hardest punchers of all time but probably would have ended the same as with Lennox.
Tommy also had a suspect chin. Tyson very similar, slightly less power but with more skill may have been able to get into Tyson and work on the inside where he was adept but once again it probably would have ended similar to how it did with Lennox.
We have to admit that. Imo relatively clearly. I agree totally with you. He was small and still pretty damn good boxer.
But this could be used in Joe Frazier case too. I do not know why you hate Joe Frazier so much that you actually call him one eyed dwarf when in reality he was taller than Mike.
I think that Mike Joe and Marciano are three small heavyweights who were sometimes much better than their taller oponents.
They all deserve credit. Not only Mike. Marciano deserves credit as boxer, not as heavyweight. Rocky Marciano wasn't.
Neither was he a heavyweight, nor was he fighting heavy boxers. Yes Joe mythology right? It seems that Joe and Muhammad are your least favorite boxers.
That is your opinion but it is not necessary to critisize them for not fullfiling your image of great boxers.
They were great boxers my opinion. I can see how Joe and Mike can be compared with their comparable sizes and swarming style, that comparison is most close and obvious.
But that's where it ends imo. I can't see h2h Joe performing much better than his son. Frazier was nothing compared to Tyson.
Tyson even had better opponents at respective stages of their careers in relative and absolute terms. Also Tyson was a jacked athlete.
Frazier was not. Obviously Frazier was good boxer to make it to the top. But imo he was only champion for a time because he was lucky.
Ali was stripped. Frazier fought an elimination. Frazier got bashed by a real champion and lost it. The fact that Frazier beat Ali once and was problems for him was as the author tells it.
A proof that Ali was limited, not the greatness of Frazier. More specifically it was representative of the "styles make fights" hypothesis.
Had he the power of Tyson, Frazier would have supplanted Ali conclusively. Frazier would have failed against Holmes, another outside fighter and been stopped by all later ranged fighters quite easily because they all had big punches to catch him on the way in.
This is just my opinion Honza but I wanted to explain my view more fully since I have trash talked Frazier without really explaining it elsewhere.
Could Wlad or Vitali have beaten Tyson on that night? Possibly on points or by late round stoppage but that's not a given.
You must be joking. Tyson was a mile ahead on points and the fight is stopped when Ruddock's arms and legs declare independence from the rest of him.
The K brothers have one huge advantage of Tyson though. They are professional and Tyson wasn't after , not consistently and you can't keep doing that in boxing and get away with it.
That was too too soon. He wasn't down. He hadn't been counted. That was too soon a knockdown", "a total fiasco", "that was surely bad judgment", "another questionable judgment" and many other things.
Who cares what commentators think or says. Please, stop act like a typical fanboy. One of the most stupid arguments. Some facts: Tyson knocked out Ribalta.
This is a big difference. Tyson hadn't problem the height. I accept the height and weight mania reigns in this i think overmanaged,doping influenced boxing but Tyson beat lots of 6'4" or taller fighter easily.
Respect tha fact at least! And don't forget Holyfield,lewis,klitschko were very skinny beanpoles earlier but their WELL-trained years.
I think their results based on doping and this is a shame. For example the prime Lewis in ran a ridicolous incredible lame estimated at half mile in The Superstars.
An average Joe can do this far better. And Chris Byrd a weak,talentless,fat,glass-chinned,boring guy beat vitali. Boxing is an overrated suckfest!
But, please respect the facts and don't create false,pathetic interpretations for klitschko sisters' reputation!
Talent arguments will go on in years and are fruitless. I guarantee you that even nowadays boxing fans ask questions like "Had Frazier more talent than Jim Jeffries?
I love Mike but have to agree with this analysis. He struggled with skills guys at 6'4 and over. Both K Bros are extremely skilled and athletic and huge.
Simply too much of an advantage. Whatever man, when it all comes to it, Klitschko's suck, they are the best because it is a weak era, if they were boxing in times of legends no1 would have ever heared of those 2 bozo's.
Their fighting style is always soooo boring to watch and they got absolutely no personality at all. What rubbish. In what era would you find the Klitschko's on the top tier?
If you think they are boring that is your call don't even try to say they would be anonymous in any earlier era you know that isn't true!
Tyson is the sharpest double edged sword of boxing. One thing is abundantly clear from the get go. Tactical boxing matches which also feature KO's are entertainment : but they do not excite nearly as much as a Tyson marathon does.
He was the most explosive HW of all time, my personal favourite to watch! Sure he has perfected his minimalist style to keep a swarming fighter like Tyson at bay, Tyson who has lost to far inferior competition to Wladimir, he is very skilled but there are 2 versions of Mike.
I know Mike fought lots of bums and cruisers early on when he was touted as the hottest thing since sliced bread and when the competition got better and bigger Mike became more challenged and that is true.
But it also coincided with the observable fact that after Mike fired Rooney you can clearly see a degeneration of his style. Lack of head movement, peek-a-boo guard and combination punching.
He lost himself. He was 7" shorter and 30lbs lighter and may never have been able to defeat prime Wladimir but in my opinion it took far more skill to stay in close and perform that style, that awesome defense and killer attack than it currently takes for Wlad to keep a fighter at bay and pick his shots while skipping out of range into relative safety when things get too hot.
If Tyson had kept it together and continued to develop that beautiful style he had there is no telling how much further it may have taken him.
He may never have beaten Lennox or might not have been able to defeat Wlad or Vitali, any claims to that are speculative, but I would certainly give him more than a punchers chance if things had been a little different for Mike.
What I'm trying to say is that it isn't hard to imagine Mike beating Lennox and moving on to being the greatest Heavyweight of the 90s as well as the 80s.
It didn't happen and may not have regardless of fate but I believe he had the tools to make it. He had and I think that if the match had hapenned 10 years before Mike would had bigger chance beating Lewis.
Imagine Riddick vs. Bowe in That would be good fight. Larry Holmes said that he would rather fight Lewis instead of Riddick. What an epic battle lol.
Holyfield is a stellar HW of course. And Bowe, despite not fighting a lot of the top contenders of the era which is a shame because he sure could have rocked, was still so awesome.
Whether he could have beaten Lewis we can't say but he sure as hell would have been the toughest competition he had faced.
Bowe had enough attributes, the size and skill to be one of the greatest champs as well. I understand Wladimir never wanted to fight his brother fair enough but Wladimir never fought anybody as massive AND skilled as Riddick Bowe.
His failure against the bigger boys would be a result of his physical limitations. His modern resistance training can compensate and increase for many things, except obviously height and reach and most importantly it does not significantly increase punch power!
It will in the sense that the increased muscle represents an increased weight. But the muscle strength, the usual bulk muscles anyway, increase it only slightly and are best developed through the heavy bag.
I think Holyfield's losses to his smaller opponents at HW may be a result of how weights may have stiffened him up somewhat.
A double edged sword, trying to gain muscle weight to fight the big boys but in the process negatively affecting your ability to match the smaller ones.
I agree. Good example was his fight with Byrd. I believe that being that young fast Evander than Byrd would not have much of a chance against him.
Also I like your favorites from 90s. Those guys would be dangerous in any era I believe. Yeah it's a mirror image list of mine as well.
George had the lasting attributes to fight on. Tommy may have faced some issues but that punch lol he was one of my favs im a fan :.
Mercer first to stop him and in brutal fashion was great and Larry shrewdly def Ray was proof how Larry's talent was sufficient to carry him past his prime into what I call the "golden age".
But it's hard to find one who would have any clear advantage against a prime Evander. David Haye? Haye vs Holyfield prime4prime. Another interesting match.
On another article I just said that Haye and Holy are somekind similiar. I was talking about Their fights with Lewis and Wladimir those are also very similiar.
It would be nice fight Haye vs. And for last I have one question. Do you think that Larry had better oponents than George? I personally think that Larry was better boxer even that I like George more but their records seems very equal.
Alright let me say first that over all Larry defeated more good opponents over all but Foreman had a few good ones as well so I can see your dilemma there.
But despite being much slicker I have a hard time imagining Foreman not eventually being able to bomb out Michael Spinks young or old version , he didn't like to be hit very hard, Larry not being a really big hitter like Foreman having to go about this one the hard way.
I think Tyson would have defeated George too had they fought despite contrary statements from himself and his trainer. Larry has some pretty good fighters like Mercer on his list late in career when Foreman met his 90's contenders and Larry beat more of his.
Foreman failed against Tommy for example and the Moorer win was lucky imo. Anyway Larry is a better boxer of course but couldn't crack an egg compared to George so they are very interesting match up in fact.
I view both as bridging the gap between modern and old and to be quite honest I couldn't place a bet either way because even though Larry would outbox George there is significant chance of a KO from the big fella.
If I can comeback to Riddick Bowe. He was appreciated by Manny Steward as well. When Manny trained Holy before scond fight he said something like this: "Bowe is is better at everything.
This is gonna be very hard training". He was right. Just compare those two. Holy was bigger, heavyer, younger, harder hitter and just like Evander was able fight both inside and outside.
There is short shot on Evander being in the crowd. When I saw him I was like:"This is just a start to a great decade of boxing".
Holy, Tommy vs. George, Mercer vs. Tommy, Mike vs. Ruddock, Lewis vs. Please Click Here. King of Aesthetics. Add Alx. All times are GMT The time now is PM.
Remember Me? Mark Forums Read. Page 1 of 5. Thread Tools.12/18/ · Mike Tyson vs Klitschko brothers? Lets say Mike was in his prime and he was put up against Vitali or Vladimir. Could Mike have been capable of beating them? I think he could beat Vladimir but vitali would be a close fight. Source(s): mike tyson klitschko brothers: newsletterinteractive.com 0 0. 9/29/ · Mike tyson vs vitali klitschko who wins? I see the fight going like this I see the fight ending in Tyson knocks Vitali out like he did Tyrell biggs or Tyson 12 round dec. 11/27/ · The Brit ace KOd Tyson in the eighth round of a brutal bout, with his fight against Klitschko stopped after the sixth round after Lewis opened a huge cut above the Ukrainian's eye.